Home|Types of Inequality|Crime and Justice Inequalities People Places and Systems
Crime and justice inequalities: people, places and systems
media
4834 view(s)
Over the last three decades, there has been a large fall in crime in Scotland, which is associated with a large reduction in both offending and victimisation amongst youth people. There have also been significant changes to policing and justice system processes in Scotland which have impacted on the lives of young people, including new legislation governing the use of stop and search and the introduction of new diversionary measures within youth justice.
The goal of our research has been to examine crime and justice inequalities in relation to people, places and systems with a particular interest in the life course. This includes:
examining what factors increase the risk of young people getting involved in offending and how these vary for boys and girls.
identifying inequalities in the likelihood of being a victim of crime and how these have changed as a result of the crime drop;
assessing the extent of inequalities in people’s criminal conviction pathways and how these were affected by childhood factors;
evaluating the impact of falling stop and search on rates of crime and the equality of policing practice across communities.
We have also conducted research on the impact of the pandemic in Scotland. This has focused specifically on the police use of the new temporary powers introduced to control the spread of the Coronavirus. Our research has examined the use of different types of policing interventions, with a particular focus on the police use of enforcement and its link to social and economic inequalities.
A substantial reduction in the use of stop and search in Scotland had no noticeable impact on crime rates; however, it did contribute to greater equity of policing practice across Scottish communities based on levels of poverty. Stop and search reform in Scotland: A study of effectiveness and equity
The crime drop in Scotland has had a strong positive impact on children and young people – with fewer being involved in offending or suffering from victimisation. However, young people growing up in poverty, those who experience adversity and vulnerability (such as parental maltreatment), and those who experience significant intervention from formal systems (such as school exclusion and police contact) are all at greater risk of involvement in youth offending and being caught up in the adult criminal justice system.
Policy responses aimed at reducing crime or reoffending must take a nuanced and cross-portfolio approach which takes serious steps to reduce the pernicious effects of poverty on children and young people, addresses and reduces experiences of trauma in childhood and counteracts the negative effects of formal interventions by ensuring that system contact (both justice and welfare) is minimised as much as possible.
Inequalities that exist in society have been exacerbated by the pandemic, especially amongst those who are the most deprived and vulnerable in society. Policies aimed at social ‘recovery’ will need to pay attention to multi-dimensional aspects of inequality that have impacted specific social groups, including health, economic, social and justice inequalities.
Over the last three decades, there has been a large fall in crime in Scotland, which is associated with a large reduction in both offending and victimisation amongst youth people. There have also been significant changes to policing and justice system processes in Scotland which have impacted on the lives of young people, including new legislation governing the use of stop and search and the introduction of new diversionary measures within youth justice.
The goal of our research has been to examine crime and justice inequalities in relation to people, places and systems with a particular interest in the life course. This includes:
We have also conducted research on the impact of the pandemic in Scotland. This has focused specifically on the police use of the new temporary powers introduced to control the spread of the Coronavirus. Our research has examined the use of different types of policing interventions, with a particular focus on the police use of enforcement and its link to social and economic inequalities.
Key Findings
How changes in childhood have contributed to the crime drop in Scotland
ACEs, places and inequality: Understanding the effects of adverse childhood experiences and poverty on offending in childhood
Like Mother, like child? The intergenerational transmission of maternal offending
The impact of structural, systemic and social inequalities in childhood on adolescent offending and early adult criminal conviction
From childhood system intervention to adult criminal conviction: Investigating sex and Indigenous status inequalities in Queensland administrative data
A crime drop for whom? Changing inequality in the profile of victims in Scotland from 2008-09 to 2017-18
Stop and search reform in Scotland: A study of effectiveness and equity
i. Interim report on police use of the new Covid-19 powers
ii. A new data report on police use of Covid-19 powers highlights links with deprivation and inequality
iii. Second data report on police use of Fixed Penalty Notices
iv. Third Data Report on Police Use of Fixed Penalty Notices under the Coronavirus Regulations in Scotland: March to December 2020
v. Data Report on Police Charges Reported to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service under the Coronavirus Regulations: March 2020 to June 2021
Policy implications
The crime drop in Scotland has had a strong positive impact on children and young people – with fewer being involved in offending or suffering from victimisation. However, young people growing up in poverty, those who experience adversity and vulnerability (such as parental maltreatment), and those who experience significant intervention from formal systems (such as school exclusion and police contact) are all at greater risk of involvement in youth offending and being caught up in the adult criminal justice system.
Policy responses aimed at reducing crime or reoffending must take a nuanced and cross-portfolio approach which takes serious steps to reduce the pernicious effects of poverty on children and young people, addresses and reduces experiences of trauma in childhood and counteracts the negative effects of formal interventions by ensuring that system contact (both justice and welfare) is minimised as much as possible.
Inequalities that exist in society have been exacerbated by the pandemic, especially amongst those who are the most deprived and vulnerable in society. Policies aimed at social ‘recovery’ will need to pay attention to multi-dimensional aspects of inequality that have impacted specific social groups, including health, economic, social and justice inequalities.