A data report scrutinising Police Scotland’s use of the new temporary powers introduced to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic shows that less than seven percent of all interventions involved the use of enforcement, such as a fine or an arrest.
Director of the Understanding Inequalities project Professor Susan McVie from the University of Edinburgh is a member of the Independent Advisory Group (IAG) on Police Use of the Temporary Powers related to the Coronavirus Crisis. The IAG was set up to provide scrutiny around Police Scotland’s use of the police powers introduced to tackle COVID-19.
As part of this work, Susan has developed an interim data report which was presented to the Scottish Policy Authority board yesterday.
The report includes:
Detailed information on police enforcement during COVID-19 including the dispersal of gatherings and use of Fixed Penalty Notices and arrests
Temporal analysis throughout lockdown showing how things have changed throughout this time period
Geographical analysis to examine and compare practice within different Scottish police Divisions
Analysis of public perspectives received by a citizen’s portal
Comparison of complaints received by the police during lockdown with earlier periods
The report shows that there was a large increase in the use of the powers, and some inconsistency in policing practice, in the early weeks of lockdown. Despite some large spikes in policing activity at key times, police use of the temporary powers gradually declined during May and June and became more consistent across Scotland. There is strong evidence that police officers have mainly focused on the use of engagement, explanation and encouragement, rather than enforcement.
The data used in the report is at an aggregate level and explores patterns at a divisional level without identifying any individuals or personal data. It includes data from the Coronavirus Intervention (CVI) system which has been established by Police Scotland to collect information on police activity in relation to the pandemic.
Susan’s expertise and data analysis are helping to inform evidence-led discussion and debate around the police use of the temporary police powers.
“It is a privilege to work closely with Police Scotland and provide real-time data analysis to help inform organisational learning and add value to operational response at a critical moment in history. I hope that a longer-term outcome of this work will include greater data sharing for research purposes.”
– Professor Susan McVie
This is a strong example of academics working in partnership with the police to use administrative data and inform understanding around practice, improve service delivery and, ultimately, save lives.
Susan will continue to support the work of the IAG and undertake further analysis of the demographic profiles of those who have experienced enforcement.
You can find the report and meeting proceedings on the Scottish Police Authority website:
Susan McVie is Professor of Quantitative Criminology in the School of Law at the University of Edinburgh. She is also the lead of the Safer Communities research programme of the Scottish Centre for Administrative Data Research (SCADR). Susan has a broad range of research interests including youth crime and justice; violence and homicide; police stop and search; crime trends and patterns.
A data report scrutinising Police Scotland’s use of the new temporary powers introduced to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic shows that less than seven percent of all interventions involved the use of enforcement, such as a fine or an arrest.
Director of the Understanding Inequalities project Professor Susan McVie from the University of Edinburgh is a member of the Independent Advisory Group (IAG) on Police Use of the Temporary Powers related to the Coronavirus Crisis. The IAG was set up to provide scrutiny around Police Scotland’s use of the police powers introduced to tackle COVID-19.
As part of this work, Susan has developed an interim data report which was presented to the Scottish Policy Authority board yesterday.
The report includes:
The report shows that there was a large increase in the use of the powers, and some inconsistency in policing practice, in the early weeks of lockdown. Despite some large spikes in policing activity at key times, police use of the temporary powers gradually declined during May and June and became more consistent across Scotland. There is strong evidence that police officers have mainly focused on the use of engagement, explanation and encouragement, rather than enforcement.
The data used in the report is at an aggregate level and explores patterns at a divisional level without identifying any individuals or personal data. It includes data from the Coronavirus Intervention (CVI) system which has been established by Police Scotland to collect information on police activity in relation to the pandemic.
Susan’s expertise and data analysis are helping to inform evidence-led discussion and debate around the police use of the temporary police powers.
This is a strong example of academics working in partnership with the police to use administrative data and inform understanding around practice, improve service delivery and, ultimately, save lives.
Susan will continue to support the work of the IAG and undertake further analysis of the demographic profiles of those who have experienced enforcement.
You can find the report and meeting proceedings on the Scottish Police Authority website:
SPA Authority Meeting Agenda 30 June 2020
About Susan McVie
Susan McVie is Professor of Quantitative Criminology in the School of Law at the University of Edinburgh. She is also the lead of the Safer Communities research programme of the Scottish Centre for Administrative Data Research (SCADR). Susan has a broad range of research interests including youth crime and justice; violence and homicide; police stop and search; crime trends and patterns.
Professor Susan McVie
SCADR - Safer Communities research programme
Related links
Independent Advisory Group: Coronavirus powers